Trump Eats The Epstein Files
July 12, 2025 · Greyson TigheFor years, the supposed existence of a secret Epstein client list served as a central narrative device in right-wing media. Figures closely aligned with Donald Trump, including political allies, influencers, and media figures, claimed that the names of powerful Democratic elites were on the verge of exposure. Among the most widely repeated assertions was that Pam Bondi, Trump's longtime ally and legal adviser, had possession of the list. During a February 2025 appearance[1] on Fox News, Bondi stated, "The Epstein client list is literally sitting on my desk right now to review." The quote spread quickly through conservative networks and social media, where it was treated as proof that long-awaited revelations were imminent.
The claim became a pillar of partisan messaging. Supporters were told that justice was close at hand and that the Trump team was finally going to expose elite wrongdoing. Pro-Trump media figures circulated photos of binders[2] intended to showcase the severity of the purported scandal, distributed directly by Bondi's office. The binders were, of course, later discovered to be filled with fluff: public filings, old casework, irrelevant legalese.[3] They were props, but worked. The goal wasn't to release real evidence; it was to maintain the appearance that something explosive was just over the horizon.
That illusion has now unraveled. In 2025, the Trump administration, through the Department of Justice, released a formal memo stating that there is no Epstein client list. The memo concluded that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide, acted alone, and was not part of a blackmail operation. No additional investigations are pending.[4]
While the memo denied the existence of a client list, it also confirmed something far more staggering: the true scope of Epstein's abuse. According to the DOJ and FBI's 2025 review, Jeffrey Epstein harmed more than 1,000 victims between 1997 and 2018 — many of them minors. This figure is dramatically higher than previous estimates, which had ranged from several dozen to a few hundred based on indictments, lawsuits, and reputable reporting. The government now insists that no other individuals were involved, that the victims were trafficked solely for Epstein, and that there is no actionable evidence linking others to the crimes.
For many, this claim defies reason. The scale of the abuse, the high-profile nature of Epstein's network, and the long-standing conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell for trafficking girls to Epstein and others make the assertion difficult to accept.
The reaction from within Trump's base was immediate and severe. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino reportedly considered resigning in protest.[5] Laura Loomer called for Bondi to resign.[6] Even Alex Jones, who had spent years amplifying Epstein-related conspiracies, "felt absolutely sick" and distanced himself from the administration's position before inevitably cooking up another conspiracy. Elon Musk's claim from a mere month ago that Trump is in the Epstein files recirculated on social media with renewed interest and speculation, especially on X due to the sites sudden far-right shift under Musk's ownership.
The Department of Justice released more than eleven hours of hallway surveillance footage from the night Epstein died, presenting it as proof that no one entered or exited the tier during those hours. The goal was to reinforce the official conclusion and quiet ongoing doubts. But the footage raised questions instead. A one-minute gap, which the Bureau of Prisons claimed was caused by a routine system reset, raised immediate suspicion. That explanation was not helped by metadata showing the file had been exported through consumer editing software, which cast doubt on how the footage had been handled.[7] No interior cell footage was included, and the view was limited to a single hallway angle. Rather than ending the conversation, the release seemed to confirm how much remains obscured.
The clearest sign that the Epstein story had become politically inconvenient came from Trump himself. In a July 12 post on Truth Social, he directly attacked his own base for continuing to push the issue, writing in defense of Pam Bondi, "We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening," before scolding supporters for what he called "trying to hurt [the administration], all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein."
Trump went further, claiming the Epstein narrative had been created by the left. "They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier," he wrote, attempting to rewrite the very narrative his movement had championed. At no point did he acknowledge that it was under his first administration that Epstein was arrested and later died. Nor did he acknowledge that his own allies, including Bondi, spent years insisting they possessed the list and were preparing to reveal it. Instead, he accused critics of "playing into the hands" of the radical left and insisted the story was a waste of time.
The post closed with a directive: "LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT!" and a pivot back to more familiar terrain—voter fraud, Biden's laptop, the 2020 election. Epstein, once a central figure in MAGA lore, was now "somebody that nobody cares about."
Now that the story is no longer useful to him, Trump wants everybody to just fuhgeddaboudit, but the same influencers who helped build the myth are now scrambling to save face. The base is splintering, accusing each other of betrayal, misinformation, or cowardice. Trump says it's time to move on. But after years of insisting the list was real, after fundraising off it, after promising justice, there’s no clean way out. The lie outgrew its handlers. And now, it's turning on them. After all, who was Jeffrey's best friend?
📬 Support Independent Journalism
Have our free newsletter delivered straight to your inbox!
Comments